This semester I read the play Twelve Angry manpower, by Reginald Rose. It is about a jury trying to scrape up with a verdict for a teenage male child who is being accused of killing his father. In the play thither are 2 very important characters. These characters are jurywoman function iii and juror Number eight. Number Three is very against talking about anything. He is convinced that the boy is guilty and doesnt care to listen to any new(prenominal) opinions. Juror Eight is very opposite of number three. Number Eight will always listen to all opinions and wants to look everything over. He does not know yet if the boy is guilty or innocent. In this play a very important spotlight is made. This point is: justice isnt justice if it is biased. Many times in this play people added their own personal lives into what they felt happened on the night of the murder. They often looked at the boys background, and decided who he was by their experiences and personal feelings. People have a natural spirit to favor one side of a case or another. Usually these feelings come from a personal experience or built in beds. Often times these feelings were challenged.
One incident that a personal situation is effecting the case is done so by Juror Number Ten.
He is not ashamed of being biased. He tells the other jurors, Ive lived amongem all my life. You cant believe a word they say. The helping of this sentence that makes it so biased is when he uses the words I amongem , and they . These words show that he is putting personal situations into his relation , also they characterized the boy into a certain group from his background. though the man knows nothing about the defendant...
If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: How it works.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.