The Criminal Justice System and It's Juvenile Delinquency

The lamentable justice form in the United States is often accused of being racist. African-Americans argon disproportionately sentenced to death, make up the bulk of the prison population, and are subjected to daily ignomies such as harassing motor vehicle stops. That there is a postgraduateer crime rate in generally total darkness urban communities is seldom disputed, entirely the causes and proper responses to that fuss are hotly debated. Many analyses focus on black youth, on whom the general future of the African-American community depends, but whose individual futures are at risk for a manakin of reasons.

While the population of the United States is alone 13% African-American, it is estimated that 53% of youths punished for juvenile offenses in the U.S. are black (Leunes, 1996, p. 699). Race, then, has been plunge to be a significant predictor of juvenile criminal behavior. However, race is believed to be confounded with socioeconomic status and urban environment (Bryant, et al, 1995, p. 77). Researchers have also determined that other characteristics are associated with a continuity of antisocial behavior: early succession of onset, frequency of behaviors, variety of behaviors, and variety of settings in which they occur are all indicators that service agencies could potentially use to screen at a relatively early age for potentially dour delinquency (Bryant,

There are three separate dependent variables. The two of these consist of ordinal number level data, the third consists of nominal level data. The first DV is take of nefarious Activity Engaged in. It is ordinal level, mensurable on a four point scale consisting of 1 = No Criminal Activity, 2 = Minor Criminal Activity, 3 = mark Criminal Activity, and 4 = Heavy Criminal Activity. The second DV is causticity of Response by the Criminal Justice System to recent Criminal Behavior. This is also ordinal level, measured on a four point scale from 1 = No carte Taken, 2 = Reprimand, 3 = Adjudication, and 4 = Incarceration. The third DV is Serious Criminal Behavior After Age 16. It is nominal level and is measured as 0 = No Commission and 1 = Commission.

Brier, Norman (1994).

Targeted treatment for adjudicated youth with learning disabilities: Effects on recidivism, Vol. 27, journal of Learning Disabilities, 04011994, pp 215-226.

External validity is the degree to which search findings are generalizable beyond the sample which was studied. If a sample is not part of the population as a whole, then the findings from a ingest can be said to be true only for that sample, and not as a general conclusion. For this study, the sample will be drawn from a cross section of high schools in order to include urban, suburban, and rural youths. However, better carefulness might be taken to ensure that the samples are pro rata drawn. That is, if too umteen subjects are drawn from rural communities, the results whitethorn be reorient one way, era if too many subjects are drawn from urban schools, results may be skewed another. Also, if the majority of white subjects are drawn from rural schools while the majority of blacks are drawn from urban schools, then the results may be confounded by environmental factors. Future research could examine each type of school separately, rather than by attempting to test them together.

Recidivism is the propensity of persons con
Order your essay at Orderessay and get a 100% original and high-quality custom paper within the required time frame.