A summarizing critique of: Organizational Predictors of Women on Corporate Boards.By Hillman. A. J., Shropshire. C. , Cannella Jr. A. A. (2007) In: Academy of Management Journal, 50: 941 - 952.

This article was an exploratory one it tried and true to bring out characteristics and the conditions that makes a firms board much likely to accommodate womanish person directors and answering the question: why do some(prenominal) firms have women on their boards but others dont? (p.941) The authors tried to identify the benefits directors misrepresentation bring for the boards establish on resource dependence conjecture (Pfeffer & Salanick, 1978). Because it studies directors careless(predicate) of the grammatical gender, they combined it with Work-group-level diversity theories to identify authorisation benefits of young-bearing(prenominal) bureau on boards of directors(p.942). Hillman rivet on organizational characteristics and earlier related researches foundations such as Dalton et la surmisal: firms that deal purify with environmental uncertainly perform better (1999), in addition to Pfeffer and Salanick proposal: organizations advise have triplet benefits from board linkages which are: advice and counsel, legitimacy, and channels for communication (1978:145, 161), taking in consideration Amason argument that the benefit of gender diversity can improve brainstorming, creativity, consideration of diverse perspectives more than the possible electronegative implication for communication (1996). Firms deliver benefits from having women on their boards; Peterson (2007:179) claims since the appearance of the B&P study, there has been increasing published evidence, straddle anecdotal and empirical, of the benefits of having female directors on boards.

Authors outlined four hypotheses summarized: the female represen tation on boards of directors positively ass! ociated with organization surface, female employees numbers, and tie in to other firms with female directors, and the firms level of diversification. They used purposive take in by selecting the spinning top 1000 public traded U.S firms that had the largest sales, and filtering it to 950 firms the adjudicate is large but not representative, the small and medium size firms were not represented in the sample, which led to a gutless generalisation for their results. The researcher adopted the deductivism... If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderEssay.net

If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: write my essay