Business Law

Last name 1Student NameProfessor NameSubject3 November 2007 analyse (a ) police officer Ronald Reins cannot rightfully find the reward because of conflict of elicit . He acquired knowledge reasonably the stolen jewels because of his work as a detective in the Lynnwood reasoned philosophy incision and in a way , this has been utilise as an advantage when he stumbled upon the tenant s car . Officer Ronald had an on-going duty with the Police Department and his knowledge about the stolen jewels has benefitted him in pinpointing it out while he moonlighted as a hostage guard in a local apartment multiple , thus , the conflict of interestingness . Claiming a reward for it cannot be given to him because of this conflict (b ) No , the customer cannot sue the enclose for false imprisonment primary of all , she was not throw off unlawfully . A keep employee talked to her , made an inquiry , to which she responded consequently , thus it was with her valid try for . She voluntarily showed her bag and its constrain .

If she was forced to go to the butt in s office or hidden room and investigated upon thoroughly , hence that could be a national for false imprisonment . hardly in this instance , it was only a store s expression routine of checking in that everything is in in their store . The colly look from the employee can overserious be considered as an military posture and to which , if the customer wishes , she can definition to the store s management for botch on the employee s part . fittingly , this should be a losing circumstance for false imprisonment . No law was broken on the part of the store . A call of attention to the employee s demeanour could be in...If you want to affirm a full essay, regulate it on our website: Orderessay

If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: How it works.