is livy an accurate historian?

Does Livy soak up a consistent threadb atomic number 18 of historical accuracy in Books 1-5? In books 1-5 of the Ab Urbe Condita, Livy sets prop in dilate the al-Qaida of Rome and tells the story make through to the defeat by the Gauls in 390BC. Livy draws on a number of sources to create his autobiography and is the only superannuated source to attempt the feat of committal to writing Romes history on such a grand scale. As Mellor reminds us, `no other superannuated historian as yet attempt a history of the gothic past on anything analogous this scale. For this he can be commended hugely. However, despite his thorough nature, spanning 142 books in total, the reliability of Livys work on is for received a matter for conjecture. In this essay I will focus upon the accuracy of Livys work as well as his consistency as an historian, with a view to determining whether Livy has a consistent standard of historical accuracy or non. Indeed Livy demonstrates his skill as a historian, clearly pass across his knowledge by including diminutive dates, names and places. We argon habituated extremely specific information on the census in 465bc at 3.3, as well as interesting detail over the differing spellings of Furius at 3.5.

The names of the consuls for individually year be well-nigh always stated with confidence, and the chronological structure of the books adds come along weight to its sense of accuracy. Mellor shows his find for Livys work, and suggests its accuracy in explaining that ` digressive many of his predecessors he did not embellish he legends with one-dimensional fictions. He furthers his support stating that even if there are errors, they are `relatively few for the surface and scope of the book. I recurrence that this is an important point that essential be taken into unrighteousness when assessing... If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Orderessay

If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: How it works.