Examinations should be maintained.

Do examinations cause in schooling an be creativity? whatsoever education experts doubt the value of traditional exams and advocate alternate(a) assessments, such as projects, interviews and teacher observation. However, despite there drawbacks, examination should not be abolished. They are essential for two reasons: to superintend learning and to encourage children to study.

Some argue that examinations induce stress , and threaten self-esteem and intrinsic motivation. However, competition and stress motivate exclusively humans everyday. Likewise, self-esteem is based on a backbone of achievement and having the ability to do things.

Examinations do not conquer learning to be creative. In fact, creativity cannot actually taught or learnt. It is traditional academic and technical skills that enable people to communicate their innate creativity.

Traditional tests have been used for centuries throughout the world and across cultures. Parents, employers and the public expect them. Empirical evidence shows that thay are a valid measure of real world conpetency. Furthermore, standardised tests enable us to detect learning difficulties in particular children, and oversee teffectiveness of schooling throughtout a country.

Perhaps most importantly, examinations encourage children to study. The motivation that they hand over is as beneficial as any. Students are provided with a empty time frame and a clear target for their study. They shout out the pleasure of successful and the disappointment of failure. This is exactly the kind of structureand counselling that children need.

If we abolish exams we lose a valuable way to monitor lizard learning and encourage children to study.

If you want to get a undecomposed essay, order it on our website: Orderessay



If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: How it works.