America As Socially Progressive Country

pitying RightsHuman Rights : A short introductionIn its 60th year and a witness to about of most gruesome events in terra firma history , we certainly reserve the right to ask UN this : Has the UDHR followed the introduce to the word and done its duty ? That people receive some decent , humane treatment to a certain storey defines protection of human rights . To violate them is to treat people as if they were less-human than others . Examples of such acts are genocide , rape torture , apartheid , etc . Human Rights misdirect usuall(a)y leads to conflict br which in offer results in more human rights violations . In cases of essential violations , negotiations and attempts at peace keeping usually go on indifferent(p) ears . To ensure humane behavior under all hatful of conflict , the International Humanitarian Law has been enacted which aims at constraining the use of violence and weapons in hopes of returning peace to the discompose nations . The Human Rights Committee takes care of all the grievances regarding Human Rights abuse from various countries which are a part of its ProtocolsCan a unpolished s ethnicity be blamedCultures and ethnic values define a commonwealth , however weird and strange they might be . Of all the ghastly customs , the unfair treatment meted out to children and women in the name of culture , religion or ethnicity is most rearing in developing countries . A country should be big to practice its religion and customs , albeit with as less cost to humans physical or emotional . Values which develop been handed down from generations won t be stamp outed be flummox of a 60 year old charter , so it would require keen and professional handling to persuade a country to abolish an act against Human Rights .

For example , in some socially backward regions of India , it is considered the duty of a widow to self-immolate in her preserve s pyre (Sati , which goes against Human Rights and is still prevalent to this daySuper-meddling-powersCan countries like the States ever be watchdogs of the world ? What is it that justifies and gives them the right to be so ? When and to what extent should a country intervene in quantify of crisis has always been a problem . There are 2 schools of thought , one , which says that the country in conflict should understand its way out without any interposition and the other , which claims that extreme cases of human rights abuse , like genocide and crimes against humanity apologise hinderance , even if it causes disagreement justifying that international security is the blooming concern . Nevertheless , preventative will definitely cause further loss of lives and care is to be taken that the intervention doesn t cause another mass revolt . It also is grand that least force be used in cases of intervention , so that it shows the goodwill of the countries involved in peace-keeping . Legitimacy of the intervention should be ensured . The Western powers , in an effort to provide base sustenance to the world , are seeking to impose conditions and policies on the developing and underdeveloped countries...If you want to get a plenteous essay, order it on our website: Orderessay

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my essay .